<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>RailSA &#187; Upgrade</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.railsa.org/tag/upgrade/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.railsa.org</link>
	<description>South Australian rail and tram discussion, information and news</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 22 Jul 2010 04:31:26 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Adelaide Hills rail upgrade not cost effective</title>
		<link>http://www.railsa.org/freight/adelaide-to-melbourne-rail-upgrade-not-cost-effective/</link>
		<comments>http://www.railsa.org/freight/adelaide-to-melbourne-rail-upgrade-not-cost-effective/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 26 Jun 2010 03:26:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Freight]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Infrastructure]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Adelaide Hills]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ARTC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Melbourne line]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rail bypass]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Upgrade]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railsa.org/?p=4275</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Operators servicing the Adelaide to Melbourne route may be able to put fears of increased rail competition to rest if the final Adelaide Rail Freight Movements Study report is accepted.
The report, compiled by consultancy firm GHD for the federal transport department, concludes that even the cheapest upgrade − improving the tortuous existing rail path through [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Operators servicing the Adelaide to Melbourne route may be able to put fears of increased rail competition to rest if the final Adelaide Rail Freight Movements Study report is accepted.<span id="more-4275"></span></p>
<p>The report, compiled by consultancy firm GHD for the federal transport department, concludes that even the cheapest upgrade − improving the tortuous existing rail path through the Adelaide Hills − is not cost effective.</p>
<p>GHD researchers found even the most productive of the five options studied would provide benefits of $190m over 30 years, compared with construction costs for the five of between $700m and $3.2bn each.</p>
<p>“While there are benefits flowing to rail track managers, train operators and the communities that surround the rail line, the size of these benefits is modest and the size of the capital outlay required to generate such benefits is large, particularly in the new alignment options,” the report says.</p>
<p><strong><a href="http://www.railsa.org/forums/viewtopic.php?p=52753#p52753">Share your opinion: View and discuss the Adelaide Hills rail bypass proposals.</a></strong></p>
<p>The current alignment has a capacity of 10.7 million tonnes of freight a year, which is more than double the 4.8 million tonnes a year currently carried on the rail line.</p>
<p>However, steep grades and tight curves force trains to travel more slowly and to use 50 percent more locomotive power per tonne than on other interstate rail freight corridors, the report says.</p>
<p>They also restrict trains to a maximum of 3,500 tonnes gross.</p>
<p>The terrain of the Adelaide Hills causes greater locomotive and wagon wear and tear and higher maintenance costs than would be incurred with a straighter, flatter alignment.</p>
<p>Responses from the Australian Trucking Association and the Australasian Railway Association to the report were awaited at deadline today.</p>
<p><strong>via <a href="http://www.supplychainreview.com.au/news/articleid/68323.aspx" target="_blank">Supply Chain Review</a></strong></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.railsa.org/freight/adelaide-to-melbourne-rail-upgrade-not-cost-effective/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Hold the line and hit the road</title>
		<link>http://www.railsa.org/suburban/hold-the-line-and-hit-the-road/</link>
		<comments>http://www.railsa.org/suburban/hold-the-line-and-hit-the-road/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Jun 2010 17:23:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Suburban]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gawler line]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mawson Lakes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rail Revitalisation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Service disruption]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Upgrade]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railsa.org/?p=4120</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Gawler line rail commuters will hit the road for four months from Sunday when work begins on the biggest upgrade in the Adelaide rail network&#8217;s history.
The Gawler Line will be shut down between Adelaide and Mawson Interchange for about four months to facilitate the major upgrade which will pave the way for electrification of the [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Gawler line rail commuters will hit the road for four months from Sunday when work begins on the biggest upgrade in the Adelaide rail network&#8217;s history.<span id="more-4120"></span></p>
<p>The Gawler Line will be shut down between Adelaide and Mawson Interchange for about four months to facilitate the major upgrade which will pave the way for electrification of the line.</p>
<p>More than 14,500 people on average board Gawler Line trains on weekdays. From Sunday, many will travel on one of 46 substitute buses between Mawson Lakes and the city. The Transport Department has urged commuters to prepare travel plans to ensure they reach their destinations on time.</p>
<p>Georgia Pollard, 19, takes the tram from Goodwood and then the Gawler train to UniSA at Mawson Lakes four times a week. &#8220;It already takes me just over an hour to get there, so it&#8217;s going to take more like an hour and a half or just over two hours,&#8221; she said. &#8220;It&#8217;s a bit ridiculous.&#8221;</p>
<p><strong>The first stage of the upgrade involves:</strong></p>
<p><strong>UPGRADING</strong> the base layer;</p>
<p><strong>INSTALLING</strong> new gauge-convertible concrete sleepers;</p>
<p><strong>IMPROVING</strong> stormwater drainage;</p>
<p><strong>REFURBISHING</strong> or replacing rail;</p>
<p><strong>CONNECTING</strong> the new Dry Creek railcar depot to the Gawler line.</p>
<p>Train services will continue from the outer suburbs of Gawler and Gawler Central to Mawson Lakes. Buses between Mawson Lakes and the city will leave Mawson Lakes Interchange as soon as seats are taken, immediately after a train has arrived. They will travel directly along Salisbury Highway, Port Wakefield Rd, Churchill Rd and Jeffcott St to Adelaide Railway Station. They will not pick up passengers but may allow passengers off if required.</p>
<p>Five stations between Mawson Lakes and the city will be closed. Other buses from Mawson Lakes will pick up passengers at designated stops on Churchill Rd.</p>
<p><strong>via <a href="http://www.adelaidenow.com.au/news/south-australia/gawler-rail-passengers-diverted-to-busses-while-track-upgraded/story-e6frea83-1225875219509" target="_blank">AdelaideNow</a></strong></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.railsa.org/suburban/hold-the-line-and-hit-the-road/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>New boom gates for level crossings</title>
		<link>http://www.railsa.org/infrastructure/new-boom-gates-for-level-crossings/</link>
		<comments>http://www.railsa.org/infrastructure/new-boom-gates-for-level-crossings/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Mar 2009 11:59:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Infrastructure]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Government]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Level crossing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Safety]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Upgrade]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railsa.org/development/?p=535</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[New boom gates and safety measures will be installed at 34 high-risk level rail crossings from today, following a $13.6 million boost in federal funding.
Transport Minister Anthony Albanese said about 100 accidents occurred at rail crossings each year.
“The investment we are making will not only improve road safety but also support local jobs and local [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>New boom gates and safety measures will be installed at 34 high-risk level rail crossings from today, following a $13.6 million boost in federal funding.<span id="more-535"></span></p>
<p>Transport Minister Anthony Albanese said about 100 accidents occurred at rail crossings each year.</p>
<p>“The investment we are making will not only improve road safety but also support local jobs and local businesses during the current global recession,” he said.</p>
<p>Crossings in Virginia, Two Wells, Mallala and Korunye will be amongst those receiving boom barrier upgrades.</p>
<p><strong><a href="http://www.news.com.au/adelaidenow/story/0,22606,25240339-2682,00.html" target="_blank">AdelaideNow</a></strong></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.railsa.org/infrastructure/new-boom-gates-for-level-crossings/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
